The Clancy Trial: What The Jury Didn't See. Attorney Melanie Little Joins Us

00:00 Sarah Rahal Breaks Down Lindsay Clancy’s Medications 01:23 Did the Mental Health System Fail Lindsay Clancy? 04:48 30 Prescriptions in Four Months 07:30 Who Was Coordinating Lindsay Clancy’s Care? 12:01 The Drug That Stood Out 16:45 Could the Lindsay Clancy Jury Hang? 20:29 Lindsay’s Calls for Help 25:19 What the Jury Knows That We Don’t Attorney and legal analyst Melanie Little joins Billy Bush as the jury deliberates in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial — and she believes Kevin Reddington has done more than enough to establish reasonable doubt. Little breaks down the critical legal question now facing the jury: Did prosecutors prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible at the time she killed her three children? The conversation dives deep into the trial’s battle over postpartum psychosis, mental illness and criminal responsibility, including why Little believes some of the prosecution’s arguments about Clancy appearing “normal” fundamentally misunderstood how serious mental illness can present. Billy and Melanie examine Clancy’s repeated attempts to seek mental-health treatment, the medications she was prescribed, her calls for help, the role of telehealth, and whether the medical system failed to recognize just how serious her condition had become. They also tackle some of the biggest unanswered questions from the investigation: the alleged crushed pills and residue that were never tested, prescription bottles found in the home, Patrick Clancy’s role, and evidence Melanie believes investigators failed to properly examine. Then comes the question that could become especially important during deliberations: Why did prosecutors apparently never play Lindsay Clancy’s videotaped interviews with the Commonwealth’s psychiatric experts for the jury in open court — but send those recordings into the jury room? Melanie explains why she finds that decision so significant and whether seeing and hearing Lindsay for themselves could affect how jurors assess her credibility. Plus, Melanie takes us inside the career and courtroom style of Kevin Reddington — the veteran Boston defense attorney whose unconventional approach, emotional closing argument and relentless advocacy for Lindsay Clancy have made him one of the central figures of this trial. With deliberations underway, Melanie makes her prediction: reasonable doubt is there — but getting 12 jurors to agree may be another matter entirely. Could Lindsay Clancy be found not criminally responsible? Could the jury convict? Or are we headed toward a hung jury? Subscribe to Hot Mics with Billy Bush for continuing coverage of the Lindsay Clancy trial, the verdict and the biggest legal and true-crime stories. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #KevinReddington #MelanieLittle #BillyBush #HotMics #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #CourtTV #Trial #LegalAnalysis You can listen live exclusively on TuneIn Monday through Thursday 9am PT / 12pm ET. Ask your Alexa or Google device to "Play Hot Mics with Billy Bush on TuneIn" to listen.