'รักชนก-ธีระชาติ' ร้อง ป.ป.ช. ตรวจสอบ 'ไชยชนก-ขรก.ดีอี' หลังพบพิรุธส่อทุจริต-ล็อกสเป็ก-ฮั้วประมูล

'Rakchanok-Theerachart' petitions the NACC to investigate 'Chaiyanok-Theerachart' and other Ministry of Digital Economy and Society officials after discovering irregularities suggesting corruption, rigged specifications, and bid rigging. They also mention the ongoing TH-AI Passport project, stating they want to see people imprisoned but have low expectations for the NACC's work. They also reveal that the NACC has at least succeeded in resolving the issue of changing the contract from a 1.6 billion baht lump sum payment to a pay-per-use system, declaring the project is doomed. More than half of those forced to register are civil servants. They said that if Phase 2 continues, it will be "extremely shameless." Regarding the lawsuit against Plan B, they thought they had missed the boat. On September 1, 2026, at 9:00 AM, at the Office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) in Nonthaburi, Ms. Rakchanok Srinok, a list MP from the People's Party, along with Mr. Theerachart Kaotrakul, advisor to the Budget Monitoring Committee of the People's Party, submitted a letter to the NACC requesting an investigation into the TH-AI Passport project. This follows their earlier investigation and identification of irregularities in the project, suggesting corruption, rigged specifications, and collusion in bidding. They had previously announced they would file a complaint immediately upon the official opening of registration. Registration and usage opened yesterday (August 31, 2026). Ms. Rakchanok stated that she submitted a complaint to the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) today, before subsequently submitting additional complaints to the Central Investigation Bureau. Initially, complaints have been filed against five individuals: 1. Mr. Chaiyanok Chidchob, Minister of Digital Economy and Society (DE); 2. Mr. Pachara Anantasilsin, Permanent Secretary of DE; 3. Mr. Theerawut Thongpak, Chairman of the TOR drafting committee; 4. Mr. Wethang Puangsub, Secretary-General of the National Digital Economy and Society Commission (NDESC); 5. Ms. Pakwan Wongpolthavee, representative of Human Intelligence Co., Ltd., the winning bidder for the TH-AI Passport project. Ms. Rakchanok initially stated that the complaint to the NACC seeks to hold Mr. Chaiyanok accountable for neglecting his duty, as she believes it was evident that the project was suspicious and irregular, yet he failed to attempt to stop it. Finding a way to cancel the project / Regarding other government officials, it is clear that they were the ones who received the policy and pushed it forward, and were also the committee that drafted the TOR. Ms. Rakchanok emphasized that the suspicious points she saw were the rigged specifications in the TOR / Specific specifications regarding public relations on nationwide advertising screens. For example, advertising on at least 400 billboards nationwide / advertising on at least 6,000 screens in convenience stores nationwide, in at least 1,500 branches / advertising in at least 200 locations in shopping malls. We can confidently say that we can count on one hand how many nationwide advertising screen owners have met these requirements. Furthermore, the People's Party's investigation revealed that the company that won the project bid and the company owning the nationwide advertising screens have the same UBO (User-Board), or ultimate beneficiary, as an individual. // Even though the company representatives deny any connection, the evidence points to the same beneficiary. Therefore, let me communicate that even if they insist on no connection, they can say whatever they want. Because ultimately, the evidence is there. Ms. Rakchanok stated that the initial plan for this 1.6 billion baht project was a lump-sum payment contract, meaning we had to pay 1.6 billion baht even if only a few people used it. // Later, she observed that what the People's Party successfully achieved was making it a pay-per-use model, although, to reiterate, our ultimate goal is to cancel the project and start over. “If you think it's truly good and worthwhile, go back and start over in the correct way. Go back and write the Terms of Reference (TOR) so that everyone can compete. But you didn't do that. I reiterate that currently, there are 1.3 million registered users, with approximately 100,000 active users. Try multiplying that by 24-25 baht. That equals the per-capita cost that the Minister and the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society have consistently affirmed—that it's only 24-25 baht per person. When you multiply that, it equals 2.4-2.5 million baht. Imagine if we were still using the old contract method.” "That means even if only 2.4 million baht was spent, we still had to pay 1.6 billion baht in total. I have always been suspicious and maintain that this is profiting from the budget, from off-budget funds—creating projects to divert money to companies that support the 'blue regime' (referring to the ...