"กรรชัย" สรุปครบ! "ต้า-ยัต" เผชิญหน้าในโหนกระแส ยอมถอยคนละก้าว จ่ายตามสัดส่วน ถอนฟ้องทุกคดี

The epic confrontation between "Yat" and "Ta" ended yesterday on the "Hone Krasae" program with a settlement and the withdrawal of lawsuits between them. Yesterday, the "Hone Krasae" program invited Yat, his wife Am, lawyer Arm, Ta, lawyer Kaimook, and lawyer Tui to the show. The program recounted the breaking point regarding Ta's resignation from the company. Yat Chaisoro revealed that he only wanted Ta to tell the whole truth, as agreed upon. He wanted Ta to tell the truth, as it was legally agreed upon when he resigned. He said Ta said he didn't want anything in return, to take responsibility for the incident involving the misappropriation of Fedfe's money. He added that they had discussed this 4-5 times. Meanwhile, "Ta Fedfe" countered, recounting the suffering he endured for the past two years, to the point of needing psychiatric help and attempting suicide multiple times. "It's been almost two years. At that time, I was like a living dead person. I didn't know how to escape being controlled, manipulated, threatened, and verbally abused every day. I was alone, the head of the family. I couldn't consult anyone about this. I had to keep it to myself until I started having mental health issues. I tried to end my life many times." "I consulted a psychiatrist, and they told me not to try to solve the problem that way. But I thought about my family; I couldn't leave them... The explanation I wrote at that time was that I left without expecting anything, because I just wanted to get myself out of that situation." In addition, Ta apologized to Am, Yat's wife, on the show, after a previous conversation where they couldn't reach an exception. Ta said, "On that day we talked, you weren't involved because we run the company together. I was annoyed, so I talked to you like that (raises hand to apologize)." Meanwhile, lawyer Tui said, "Why doesn't Yat consider Chaisoro to belong to Ta as well, like Ta once thought Fedfe belonged to all his friends?" Yat Chaisoro said, "He spoke out after the media, and it attacked the company, regarding the channel deletion and the copyright issues." Lawyer Tui said, "It's a tangled mess that you think he shouldn't have received." Am stated, "It was probably during that time, not just the typed chat. The two of them talked a lot about things. Towards the end, Ta became less talkative. Am saw the situation at that time." Am did not confirm the chat messages in question. Ta Fedfe also stated, "Suppose I leave on my own and don't take anything. I asked 'Yat,' 'I'm leaving with just the clothes on my back. My father is sick. We have a salary of 40,000 baht. We're asking to leave. We've worked together for 6-7 years. Won't you give us any severance pay?'" Regarding the lawsuits amounting to 20 million baht, Lawyer Arm (Yat's lawyer) explained that the reason for advising Yat to pursue two lawsuits (Computer Crime Act and Copyright Act) was because both parties refused to talk to each other. Lawyer Arm said that 70% of the reason for recommending lawsuits was because the friends weren't talking to each other at all. Talking in court would allow the court to control the situation. After discovering evidence of Facebook recovery, they decided to sue. Concerning Ta's suspicion about objections to his bail in the Min Buri Court case, the legal team clarified on the program that Yat's side did not object to bail at all. Regarding the issue of the share transfer agreement and the suspected forgery of signatures, Am clearly confirmed that Ta signed every document himself. And there was no illness at that time. The program concluded that the signature was genuine and not forged. Further details will be discussed in court. Additionally, Yat's side raised concerns about Ta's financial transactions, finding accounts linked to online gambling websites. Ta strongly affirmed his innocence, stating he has never been involved in or gambled on any platform. At one point, P' Num analyzed the positions and solutions of both sides, stating that the truth of their situation might be a conflict of emotions that cannot be resolved through discussion, but it's crucial to consider principles and legal rights. P' Num further explained, "Today, the focus is on Ta's objective: demanding justice and getting his share back. Simply put, go back to the day Ta held 49% of the shares, reconcile the accounts, see how much money there was from the company's inception until the day he left, subtract the debts borrowed from directors to buy a house and car, and see what's left. Then, divide it correctly." Regarding the 300,000 baht that Ta received, it was money he borrowed from Yat to give to the Fedfe side. Yat claimed he borrowed it to repay a friend, and later, during a discussion about his departure, consulted with the accountant who determined that such a method wasn't feasible. He hasn't repaid the debt yet, so it was deducted from his shares. P' Num added that the 300,000 baht that Yat claimed wa...